- Member since May 11, 2006.
- I am a man from Michigan (United States)
- I am in the groups Deep debate
- I have 336 comments, 7 philosophies
My Philosophies
- Does God cause evil or allow it to happen to people?
- What kind of man is acceptable to women and what kind of a woman is acceptable to man?
- Can man and man make a couple?
- Is man equal to a woman?
Guest Book
1 - 4 of 4
-
likewhatitis100 : Hemosexuality is illogical from a biological standpoint on June 10, 2008Winning argument
Here is the definition of abuse from anwers.com
abuse (?-byuz') pronunciation
tr.v., a•bused, a•bus•ing, a•bus•es.
1. To use wrongly or improperly; misuse:
The argument:
From a biological standpoint, every human being has reproductive organs. Reproductive organs are for reproducing. Therefore, every human being was designed to reproduce.
It takes a relationship to reproduce, and the relationship for reproducing is heterosexuality. Human beings in that relationship are heterosexuals. Therefore, every human being was designed to be heterosexual.
Since homosexuality relationship cannot reproduce, it doesn't need reproductive organs.
Thus, the presence of reproductive organs in that relationship is clear evidence of artificial design error, which makes the relationship unnatural. So, from a reproducing standpoint reproductive organs are for a relationship that reproduces, which is heterosexuality.
It therefore means that the intended relationship for human beings is heterosexuality not homosexuality.
Since the relationship for human beings from a design standpoint is heterosexuality, it stands to reason that homosexuality is abuse.
Analysis
Premises
(Premise 1) - Is it not an observable fact that normal human beings have reproductive organs?
(Premise 2) - Is it not true that reproductive organs are for reproducing?
(Conclusion 1)-If these two observable facts hold, the conclusion that every human being was designed to reproduce, holds.
(Premise 3) - Is it not an observable fact that it takes a relationship to reproduce?
(Premise 4) - Is it not an observable fact that it takes a relationship of a woman and a man to reproduce?
(Conclusion 2)-If it is true that all normal human beings have reproductive organs and reproductive organs are for reproducing, and it takes a heterosexual relationship to reproduce then the conclusion that all normal human beings are designed to be heterosexual holds.
Since the four observable facts are true, the conclusions they support are also true.
It therefore means this argument is sound.
A sound argument is the truth
-
likewhatitis100 : A President of a country should have a reasoning that has less deficit. on April 12, 2008A President of a country should have a reasoning that has less deficit.
Knowledge is hierarchical. What is true of knowledge is also true of reasoning because knowledge at each level of the knowledge hierarchy develops reasoning of the same level to it. Thus, the higher you go the knowledge hierarchy the more the reasoning is expanded. Whereas knowledge base can be expanded, it is going up the hierarchy that expands both knowledge and reasoning.
One's reasoning can not be above one's knowledge level. Education is Knowledge. So, one's reasoning can not be above one's education level because education develops reasoning equivalent to its level.
It is a fact that elementary education has more deficit than university level education.
So, a President of a country should have university level education, since reasoning and education at this level have less deficit. -
likewhatitis100 : What education level should a president /head of state have? on April 9, 2008What level of education should a president /head of state have?
Minimum qualifications for a president/head of state -
likewhatitis100 : Is leadership an inborn trait? on April 9, 2008Is leadership an inborn trait?
Knowledge precedes talking.
A child is born with the ability to talk. The ability to talk enables the child to develop talking. Knowledge should be acquired first so that talking will be achieved.
Without knowledge talking will never be realized. Because there will be nothing to talk about.
So, talking is always about knowledge. So, knowledge has precedence over talking.
Deaf people are considered dumb because talking depends on hearing. Hearing lets in knowledge. Knowledge will make talking possible.
So, although some deaf people have the ability to talk, since, they don't have hearing ability, which lets in knowledge, they can't talk.
This shows that knowledge causes talking and talking does not cause knowledge. Thus knowledge has a higher precedence than talking. Knowledge is a stand alone.
Knowledge is hierarchical
Whereas knowledge is hierarchical,reasoning is a variable that develops as the knowledge hierarchy goes up. It increases as the knowledge base widens and as the knowledge hierarchy goes up.So, what expands reasoning is going up knowledge hierarchy and not just widening knowledge base.
Leaders are made
People are not born leaders.Leaders are made. Knowledge and pedagogic are acquired and they make a person a leader.So, expanding reasoning plus pedagogic skills makes a person have a potential to be a leader of many. A leader must be knowledgeable in many ways.
A person can not be a leader on the basis of their charisma
Whereas charisma is an inborn trait,a person can not be a leader on the basis of their charisma.A person can only be a leader on the basis of knowledge and pedagogic.
Knowledge is a variable that increases with time.So, without knowledge charisma is meaningless.
It is knowledge that displays charisma
It is knowledge that displays charisma and charisma describes the depth of knowledge.Because without knowledge there will nothing to talk about and the inborn charismatic trait will not be realized.Knowledge precedes talking. Knowledge should be acquired first so that talking will be achieved.Without knowledge talking will never be realized. Because there will be nothing to talk about.
Elementary Education has more deficit.University level education has less deficit.
What is true of education acquired is also true of the reasoning, which the education acquired evaluates to.Higher education evaluates to higher reasoning and less education evaluates to less reasoning, because education develops reasoning.The less the deficit in education the more the reasoning is expanded, which implies good reasoning and less deficit in reasoning.Thus the more the deficit in education, the more the deficit in reasoning.
So, a leader must have reasoning expandable to university level education, since reasoning at this level of education has less deficit.
So, leadership is not an inborn trait. Leaders are made.Expanding reasoning plus pedagogic skills makes a person have a potential to be a leader of many.


