Who in ultimate terms created you?
-
No, not in simplistic termsVoted for by drkbrdmstr.
Meaning, not in the sense, that your mama and papa performed the natural ritual of reproduction thereby "created" you. Some one has asked, "Who created God?" Well, the ignorance of the question is quite evident, as is the stupidity. God is a word that is used for identifying the supernatural. So what is super(meaning above) is above the natural state of mind. In a sense, God is the Overmind of the natural world; from humans to animals to other types of matter to the universe at large. And u cant say man has created God because that is impossibly. We humans are not supernatural. If we were, then we could transcend time and space, or fly, or do anything that is seemingly impossibe to our finite minds and bodies. Perhaps the abstractness or abstract ideas pertaining to God was created by Man but not God. Ideas are formed by man but reality is not. Reality is formed by nature which in turn is formed by God. One could say God is Nature or Nature s God. But that is not precisely true, for Nature is not God per se. Let me give you an example: Nature is like an apple tree. Humankind are its apples. The apple tree bears fruit according to its kind. That is its natural course of life. An apple tree does not bear oranges or grapes; only apples. That is what nature does. But who or what create the apple tree. Well, lets go to its birth and we find a seed. That seed goes back and forth from a tree to a seed again and again till you find its originator. For everything has a beginning. that is natural, isnt it? Well, thats all I have to say for now, that is, till my mind finds something else to say.


Registration is required because of issues with spam. It is fast and free! This author would LOVE to get a comment from you, please join!
September 28, 2005
Edit | Reply
Paradox of the stone
Can God create a stone so heavy that he cannot lift it? Either he can or he can't. If he can't, then there is something he cannot do, namely create the stone, and therefore is not omnipotent. If he can, then there is also something that he cannot do, namely lift the stone, and therefore he is not omnipotent. Either way, then, God is not omnipotent. A being that is not omnipotent, though, is not God. God, therefore, does not exist.September 28, 2005
Edit | Reply
ha
haha, that's your proof for God not existing? Just because of a stupid paradox.....God can do anything that is logically possible within our world, that is, he cannot make 2 + 2 = 5, but that does not make him not omnipotent.September 28, 2005
Edit | Reply
Descartes
It's not "my" proof, just something logically facinating. According to Descartes God can do the logically impossible, he can make 2+2=5 and thus he can make a stone so heavy that he cannot lift it, and lift it. :)September 29, 2005
Edit | Reply
ok
I'm sure if this "God" is omnipotent, then he could create a new existance where saying that you are lifting an object you cannot lift makes perfect. But we all know that God has been lazy and unconfident ever since he saw how his masterpiece was turning out... poor guy... what happens when an unstoppable force hits an immovable/impregnible wall, are the energies transfered? Or does reality shift? In our reality there are no certainties; nothing is absolute. Blakc is the darkest, but it can always get darker. Also, when people say "man made god" they are saying that he is fictional, like how man made Hamlet.Energizer Bunny
October 3, 2005
Edit | Reply
Energizer Bunny
October 3, 2005
Edit | Reply
Cornilius
August 30, 2006
Edit | Reply
Please register or login to comment! It's totally free