-
following Darwin's Theory...25% Voted for by DuMachstMichTot, TheDarknessVisible.
it must have bin the egg. Evolution happens in the next generation after individuals needs something or doesnt need something. So the change must have been in the egg. Like that blind cave fish, it had eyes, but since it was so dark there, it didny need to have eyes caus it couldnt see anyway... the egg came first following Darwin's theory...
-
mutantVoted for by angeltrappedinhell.
If you look at it scientifically a chicken could just be a mutated dinosaur that mated wih more of it's own kindand soon over MANY years a new speicies came to be but that now raises a new question. Which came first. the dinosaur or the egg?
-
-Voted for by Axelle Black.
What do we eat first? The egg for breakfast, then the chicken for lunch or dinner. It's that simple...
The egg came first, and is still coming first.
-
FishVoted for by A Dreamer Awake.
The egg, of course. Whether you believe in evolutionism or creationism, you'll be of the thought that creatures of the see came before creatures of land. Fish lay eggs. Therefore, eggs came before chickens.
-
egg of courseVoted for by serge imperio.
in the second story of creation,god first made the garden of eden. afterwards he created man; then the animals. it is therefore very evident that before there was a hen, there were already two eggs!
-
Why does it matter.Voted for by warrior-for-Christ.
God created this world with everything in mature form. Adam was a man not a baby. Eve was a women not a baby. Trees were in full form. So the chicken had to of been first.


Registration is required because of issues with spam. It is fast and free! This author would LOVE to get a comment from you, please join!
December 25, 2005
Edit | Reply
Actually not quite but close.
There are no Darwin's laws. It is a theory. Law and theory don't mean the same thing. Newton had a law of gravitation. This is the mathematical formula or procedure to calculate the strength of gravitational attracting. It however does not speculate on WHY that is the relationship. It was merely the formula which matched all of Darwins observations, and are therefor laws. On the other hand, a theory is a testable explanation consistant with observations that also makes testible predictions of as of yet unobserved phenomena.January 6, 2006
Edit | Reply
Please register or login to comment! It's totally free