Is there really a presennt time?
-
This came to me a while ago.50% Voted for by Dr Thrax, TeChNoWC.
One day, sitting in Barns & Nobles over a coffee or two, I watched the clock as my friend was talking about his end of the current philosphial veiw over weather or not language is meaningfull. I than noticed that by the time "Now" has happened, it was already over. The question seemed to be a head ache indusing one. Is there such thing as "present time"?
Two weeks later, I found myself in an interesting cnversation over head ache inducing philosophys. The same question arose by my friend whilst I was explaining my veiws on eternaty.
Throught all of this, I would like to say: There is no present, everything takes time to travel too and from your mind. If you are staring at your computer screen, you are staring at light that was produced a millionth of a second ago. Even though it's a short amount of time, it still has already passed before you saw it. Furthermore, when you are contemplating when "now" is, it took you mind a bilionth of a second to realize what information it was sending to itself.
So if any one asks you what you are doing now, or tells you to focus on whats hapeneing now. It may be a good idea to tell him or her that there is no "now"
-
The Present Must ExistVoted for by Gate Keeper.
Sure, ok, everything takes time to travel to and from your mind, so the things I'm seeing now have passed before they reached my mind, but it doesn't negate the fact that at a certain point in time, they existed at the same time I existed whether I was conscious of it or not. Without the present there could be no past, and if that were the case, nothing would exist at all.
So I know everybody agrees with that, but I'm saying that "now" always exists; we are just not conscious of it until later. But just because we can't know "now" until it's passed doesn't mean "now" doesn't exist. On the contrary, it MUST exist.
-
Everything has already happenedVoted for by leakypen.
I see time like a pack of cards, knocked over by a godly hand so as we can see each card and work through them one by one, that means that everything has already happened so it isn't exactly "now". I think time is a way of organising things, our brains do not have the capacity to take everything in at once, we can't see the 4th dimension but because the pack of cards has been knocked over we can split it, in our heads into past, present and future. "Now" is something we have invented to help us understand the world around us and like our senses it narrows things down.



Registration is required because of issues with spam. It is fast and free! This author would LOVE to get a comment from you, please join!
keyman7
March 27, 2006
Edit | Reply
March 27, 2006
Edit | Reply
Not that you are wrong..
Truthflly, you are wrong. No offence but now just happened before i could grab ahold of it and take it. We plan to do everything in our bodys or mind before we do them, I planed to reply before I did and decided toclick the reply befre my body could. Everything we think of, we think of doing in the future. Everything we have done, we've done in the past. Even if at 2:45:23 AM I scrath my head. By the time my hand has reached my head, I have already thought of it, and by the time I have scrathed my head, I already had.Weydon
March 27, 2006
Edit | Reply
March 28, 2006
Edit | Reply
Once again...
Now is far from real. truthfully there is now, yet we can't experiance it. So in human life there is no 'now'. I will agree due to further study and thought that 'now' exists, but please agree with me that now is something untangeable by human. Because time is a string of now, I guess you could say we always live in now. Becuase humans have given certain names to 'now''s that have happened (Past, Present, and Futre) we have to catorgozie something as one of those times. Present is too flawed. Say you were walking up the stairs. Think of it, if you must (and yes I am redirecting my philosophy), you have done this latyer on in the string of 'now' therefore canceling its existance. Thank you for the argument nonethe less. I would hope it to be more constructive next time.Weydon
March 29, 2006
Edit | Reply
TeChNoWC
July 22, 2006
Edit | Reply
Begs the question: Then what?
I agree with you, Dr Thrax. And if there is no present, the past no longer exists and the future has not yet existed, what does exist?November 5, 2006
Edit | Reply
Please register or login to comment! It's totally free