In the old days of what we now refer to as Greek or Roman(ect) mythology they believed as we do about GOd in Chistianity or similarily.
-
bit off topic but....60% Voted for by praise-reborn, RuthArabellaTrasher, mudgod.
Who's saying that you shouldn't question Christianity?
The Lord doesn't want us to have blind faith but informed faith. Plain fact is that a solid truth will remain solid no matter what questions you put to it. Heck, if not for questioning and study I wouldn't have become Christian myself.
Yes faith is a matter of trust, but you can also test faith.
-
Why Are Their Beliefs Classified As Myths?Voted for by SmokeFollowsBeauty.
As stated the Greeks and Romans believes in many gods and goddesses. They had their own stories and proof of their beliefs. In todays world the Christian God walked on water,parted a sea,arose from the dead, cured uncurable things and made a man from dirt and a woman from his rib. So I am not bashing Christianity that is the religion I was brought up as, but as of now I am learning before I decide what I believe. I am simply wondering, why are what they say myths but Christianity is completely true? They say we should not question it, but is this because no one has an answer?
-
Just a note on ancient beliefsI just thought that I should put in my two cents as a student of Classics. You are correct that all those things that we now call "myths" were believed in by a large number of people in the ancient world. However, it's also hard for someone like you or me who was raised as a Christian to understand a polytheistic mindset. There is a good chance that most people did not believe in ALL the gods simply because there were too many. A follower of Cybelle would quite possibly believe in her and doubt the existence of Mithras Sol Invictus (Both gods just mentioned were the gods of major mystery religions in the ancient world.), but would he also doubt the existence of Iuppiter? I doubt it, but it's possible.Voted for by M Joel Savage.
Similarly, their literature contained, if not exclusively religious content, the gods, more often than not. Even writers like the poet Catullus, who was more than likely an atheist, addressed the gods in their work. Others, like Vergil, wrote stories and poems about mythological characters which were not seen as religious dogma. A historian by the name of Dionysus of Halicarnassus wrote a history about Aeneas, just as Vergil did (and years before he did), but Vergil's Aeneid was better loved by the people because it is, frankly, better written. Thus, it became at the time (and still is) the accepted form of the story.
Many other myths have more than one form, written down by different people, and, as these are all we have to go by, we must assume that the religion of the ancient world was much more varied than Christianity is. Thus, the parallels exist between the stories of the two different beliefs systems, but there are also huge differences. Paganism was simply not as monolithic as modern relgions, and belief in mythology likely varied by family and even individual.










Registration is required because of issues with spam. It is fast and free! This author would LOVE to get a comment from you, please join!
May 5, 2006
Edit | Reply
mudgod
December 1, 2006
Edit | Reply
Energizer Bunny
December 1, 2006
Edit | Reply
I agree
Energizer Bunny
December 1, 2006
Edit | Reply
grant
December 1, 2006
Edit | Reply
TeChNoWC
December 1, 2006
Edit | Reply
grant
"faith without doubt is faith not worth having" -KierkegaardIt is the simple passion and ethos of belief. Conviction is delusion, because it sets out to not let the will have a say, as it is controlling and intrusive. The will, on the other hand, is controlling and intrusive of belief. Belief humbly obeys. It is the subjective superpower in a universe that is strictly subjective, thus being the ultimate facility and closest link to the nature of reality itself; this reality being the condition (metaphysical) rather than the illusionarily observed (senses). Thus, faith is hope in the things unseen.
grant
December 2, 2006
Edit | Reply
TeChNoWC
December 2, 2006
Edit | Reply
grant
December 3, 2006
Edit | Reply
TeChNoWC
December 4, 2006
grant
December 5, 2006
Edit | Reply
Heaven is at hand.
TeChNoWC
December 5, 2006
Edit | Reply
Applehead
December 6, 2006
grant
December 7, 2006
Why not just call it that? "source". One could say that "this illusion" is source at rest, therefore dreaming.. Source is deaming you. You aren't dreaming this, you are dreamt. When you awake you are source. You can then consciously choose to dream or not
ExpensiveThinker
December 9, 2006
Edit | Reply
Please register or login to comment! It's totally free