-
Don't stoop down to their level...41% Voted for by Auxiliar, Dwn, Darkwolf618, Whispers of Jasmine, Energizer Bunny.
I can see that here neutrality is impossible as an application, but it doesn't need to affect style. Also, the best way to figure the zealots from the neutral is to see that the evidence is cited, and that the facts have basis. It's one of those few western traditions that gives me no shame at all. I am interested in hearing how Bush is responsible, and not simply complicit, in 9-11. At any rate, it sounds like a fun exercise in political-science fiction. Now that Strunk and White are out of the way, I'll begin.
First, politics at its better moments ought to treat political opponents, not as mythological villains (axis of evil) but as faulty policy. The policy should have the faults, and it is the misfortune of the American people that they look to character, as you do, for the context of their chagrin. While this befits royalty, in that their character represents the aspirations of their people and not the people's call to political action, it is unbefitting of democracy.
Second, though the war in Lebanon is atrocious, I see no links between the planning to wage it and the president. It is rather the way that the neo-cons linked Sadaam and Osama - they focus on the immorality to the point where the distinctions vanish and immorality is all they can see. The immoral people are then all seen to be deserving the same course of action. Afterwards, immoral people are all seen to be the same, and after this such rhetoric is exercised on all that the leaders shall hope to attack. The only prerequisite on this level of "politics" is that people are angry, and do not discern. Of course, I wouldn't dismiss the idea that Bush is involved directly with the planning. After all, Clinton sold the Israelis their first attack helicopters, and both the blue and the red (or the blue and the grey, or the Red Rose and the White Rose or whatever color scheme you'd like) have supported repressive regimes alike until, like Iraq, they get inconvenient. Damn liberals!
We can see this sort of furor on both sides of this spectrum, especially here.
"Do you by chance mean the ones who are of a diferent faction of Islam and would be sponcering thier own terror leaders other than osama?"
This is an exercise in considering any left-leaning Musulman Giaour a terrorist.
"He has no feelings of any type of shame what cruelties and injustices he has been inflicting on the Earth."
This is not an exercise of quite the same level of political kneejerks. Instead, it is eerily reminiscent of the words of St. Bernard of Clairvaux, urging on the second crusade (a twelfth century failure).
"You cannot but know that we live in a period of chastisment and ruin; the enemy of mankind has caused the breath of corruption to fly over all regions; we behold nothing but unpunsihed wickedness. The laws of men or the laws of religion have no longer sufficient power to check depravity of manners and the triumph of the wicked."
Please, everybody. We live in the information age, you're using it to type this all. Let's not attack each other with the threats of propaganda and zeal. Let's attack each other with information, or at least start the propaganda and zeal with solid journalism.
-
He is Certainly SatanVoted for by Mujtaba H Zaidi.
He drafted a nefarious plan to kill the people and destroy the biggest commercial area called trade tower. He asked his community of worth 4000 people not to go and attend their business activities in the Twin Towers that day. Then he committed a shameful massacre in a weak country of Afghanistan. He displayed butchery of worst kind in poor Iraq by killing the young males by brutal tortures, dishonouring the innocent and gentle ladies, battering and murdering the children and the elderly, ordered bombardment on the Holiest places like Holy Najaf-e-Ashraf, and Karbala-e-Moalla, and pushed millions of people into the state of misery, injuries, hurt, mental and physical torture, disability and death. But he has no repentence and remorse on his condemnable acts. Now, he drew one more nefarious scheme of extreme brutality by ordering his filthy Israeli forces to invade the poor Lebanon and exercise the same cruelties which are characteristics of his ill-nature. He is so wretched and nefarious that he has no mercy for the innocent people of Almighty God, and he is enjoying the bloodshed scenes when helpless masses are being killed and injured by the ruthless forces of Israel... He has no feelings of any type of shame what cruelties and injustices he has been inflicting on the Earth. He has forgotten altogether that he will have to be responsible for his treacheries and mercilessness before the greatest Creator on the Day of Resurrection.....Do you know the name of Satan??...He is far more satanic than Satan and Beelzebub. The name of this filthies butcher is george bush, a curse and blur on the face of USA and the Globe!!!! And his dirtiest and ugliest mistress condo lizza rice is the cruelest woman in the world. She is so ugly that we want to vomit on seeing her face on screen or in newspapers.
-
more to the pointVoted for by Dwn.
was winston churchill satan? he wouldn't let poor little adolf play......awwwww to bad
-
Venting is OkayVoted for by Energizer Bunny.
***Do you know the name of Satan? george bush***
-------------------------------------------------------
Nothing wrong with venting for everyone has to do it every now and then but sooner or later one must wake up.
-
HmmmVoted for by Dwn.
So here we find the support room for terrorists I see, Pull out your Islamic brushes and try to paint yourselves as heros. As heretics you try to define others as infedels, then desire to call some one else satan ...Good luck and best wishes in hell with your seven virgins, Oh and by the way once you have exploited there virginity , do you get seven more,,,,,what happens to the first set.
-
GET OFF YOUR SOAP BOXVoted for by prettyinpink3325.
before you start pointing your finger try to remember who is protecting us from things like that happening to us??? its bad things, but i would be so amazed if George Bush made all of those things happen. If we elected a man like that in office, then maybe theres something wrong with the ppl here, and if u have a problem with americans, then maybe u shuld go to a different country. so next time u complain, do something about it, put actions behind your words, because ur lucky its not u sitting there being tortured. instead of debating about it we shuld work to end it. and if we get out of the war, it doesnt mean its going to end.
-
No.Voted for by ghilf.
It is dangerous to make confusion between good and evil, instead of distinguishing between them.
-
u neva noeVoted for by prepy az kan be.
diz gui iz triin 2 be az fair wit us az posible but mabi he iz makin mistakes on da wai but i think he iz doin da right thin
i izent ok wit da pointlez war wit irak but i think he iz a gud man
EBERI 1 MAKEZ MISTAKES!!!
Adding your reply:
Registration is required because of issues with spam. It is fast and free! This author would LOVE to get a comment from you, please join!
September 22, 2006
Edit | Reply
Satan or evil?
I am not a believer or supporter per se.. I would rather say men suffer dysfunctional adaptation to society in general. We have been in a long period of acclimatization of finding balance and it has been a long struggle. I have faith that men will find the middle path between extremes and goodness will come out as an evolutionary step toward serenity and wisdom. :)Auxiliar
December 19, 2006
Edit | Reply
bob2314
December 20, 2006
Edit | Reply
AUXILIAR
SO what am i to believe that isral was behind 9/11. like everything on the intrnet this should be taken with a grain of salt!Please register or login to comment! It's totally free