There are 4 choices, 4 votes for grant's debate

Cemeteries.

  • What do you think of them?

    Personally I think they are a waste of good compost.

    Voted for by grant.
    View 10 comments
  • :

  • CEMETERIES ARE PROBABLY THE RICHEST PLACES

    It’s probably full of wealthy ideas. ALL those ideas which could have been used to find a cure for for terminal illnesses such as Aids,Lupas, cancer and any disease that you can think of, which has no cure, might be in that place. And all those ideas which could have been used to improve the well being of the people might also be in that place. So the reason why we are having the problems we are experiencing now, is either some one was just selfish or was not accorded the chance to use their ideas during their life time.

    Voted for by likewhatitis100.
    View 6 comments
  • :

  • HUMAN LIFE SPAN WAS NEVER MEANT TO BE CUT SHORT

    Every human being is unique and has a specific task that can only be done by them. And the task should be survival oriented since the human beings are here on earth to live a full life span. The human life span can be split into a number of stages: infancy, childhood, adolescence, young adulthood, maturity and old age. Life expectancy at birth is 77.2 years in the U.S. as of 2001.So, realizing it would be self defeating if human beings could not fend for themselves; they were given five senses so they can survive in any harshest environment. So, with the five senses they came up with ideas to make themselves survive the full life span. They came up with farming ideas, building ideas, ideas to make medicine etc. The objective was to be able to live the full life span. Human life span was never meant to be cut short. It’s a fact that human beings were given the capability to sustain themselves throughout their full life span. And, it is fact that human beings have capabilities in different areas. Since human beings were given the capability to sustain themselves throughout their full life span it stands to reason that they have capability to find a cure for terminal illnesses which cut the lives of human beings short. This capability that human beings were given has the capacity to overcome anything that threatens life. So, at any point in time human beings are supposed to be on top of the situation. Since this is not the case, it is reasonable to assume that either someone was selfish or was not given the chance to contribute to survival of mankind. So they died with their ideas which could have benefited mankind.

    Voted for by likewhatitis100.
    Add a comment
  • :

  • A "lifespan" is relative.

    Check out the living conditions in Bangladesh. Many more Bangladeshies than Americans have completed their "uniquely specific tasks" much quicker (due to a shorter life span). This must make them much more efficient (according to your argument).

    Voted for by grant.
    View 9 comments
  • :

    •  

    None of the choices fit your opinion?  Add one →