-
Just Me....I'm bisexual. I have been that way for a while. I find men and women equally attractive and can pursue sexual and romantic relationships with both. I prefer men to women in most cases, but am really picky with both. I've been with women, but have never actually dated one. Just can't handle two periods in one month, too much drama really. I tend to gravitate toward men in friendships as well though, so that's just the kind of girl I am.35% Voted for by iamlost, IvoryRose, Princess Wolf, Oral Fixation, ButerfliSpirit. (6 total)
I've heard people say that bisexual is just another way of saying promiscuous. That's we'll do anyone, and I think that's far from true. I find that I'm one of the pickiest people in my circle of friends. It takes a lot to catch my eye, but you don't have to be a specific gender to do so.
Anyway, that's just me. What do you think? -
All To be said is....Love the people, for the person in them, not the sex of them. Each one of us is unique and interesting in some way, right?17% Voted for by iamlost, frndofyaweh, Weydon.
Bi-sexual: Is just that, sex with male and female alike, is okay with them.
Me? Straight as an arrow, but not afraid of what sex people like or worried about wether my new friend is gay or bi. If I like chatting with them or having lunch with them, that is all alright with me. Just don't expect any sexual relationships to develop
-
i just dont carei, too, am bisexual...17% Voted for by iamlost, Crazyhead, Disturbia Notorious.
i'm not really so much attracted to guys physically...
i just like them mentally...
but i dont let gender get in the way if i "like" someone...
i much perfer girls, but if the right guy presents himself (when i'm not already in a relationship) i'm not going to pass him up based entirely on his gender... -
bisexuallity HELL YEABisexuallity and cheating two totally diffrent things. Cheating you go out side of your relationship for sexual pleasure. Bisxuallity and homosexuallity are both logical because it's a biochemical reaction in the body, making you attracted to the same sex and more so the male body does physically match up and so does the female body you need to go back and research your biology. And learn some basic bio-chem while you're at it. Cheating and bisexuallity are not anywhere close to being the same. Listen to ivory rose before you are mad a total idiot and you mentioned adultry before, any sane judge would throw the case out instantly because it's not seen as a crime anymore.11% Voted for by Sorrows Angel, RebelRebel.
-
If you're picky, you're not bisexualEveryone has male and female sensitivities. In general, the female sex has more female gender and the male sex has more male gender.Voted for by Brew Kline.
A bisexual person is one who like their mate to be their gender opposite regardless of their biological sex.
I like women 99% because I find their feminity attractive. I've only met one man in my entire life that was as beautiful as a woman, and he was definately very feminine but not gayish feminine if you know what I mean.
-
BISEXUALITY IS JUST AS WRONG AS CHEATING.Every person has feelings. Feelings should not lead people, only reason and logic should. If one is sexually aroused by a person married to someone, should they go ahead and satisfy their desire? That i
Latest •
Categories •
Groups •
Forums
| |
|
| |
Adding your reply:
Registration is required because of issues with spam. It is fast and free! This author would LOVE to get a comment from you, please join!
grant
December 31, 2006
TeChNoWC
January 2, 2007
Edit | Reply
Weydon
January 7, 2007
Edit | Reply
bob2314
December 31, 2006
IvoryRose
January 1, 2007
bob2314
January 1, 2007
Edit | Reply
"to thine own self be true"
i always hear that there is no such thing as a bisexual lol that's from my gay friends. my straight friends avoid the topic at all costs lmao.Kazrith
December 31, 2006
TeChNoWC
January 2, 2007
Edit | Reply
Princess Wolf
December 31, 2006
Agree
I am Bi myself, and i agree with everything you wrote ^_^, but I get into moods, one year I will want a man the next I may want a woman.Kazrith
January 1, 2007
Princess Wolf
January 3, 2007
Kazrith
January 3, 2007
Princess Wolf
January 4, 2007
Why do you ask if you don't mind telling me?
Kazrith
January 4, 2007
Princess Wolf
January 4, 2007
Kazrith
January 5, 2007
Princess Wolf
January 6, 2007
Edit | Reply
TeChNoWC
January 3, 2007
Edit | Reply
pnktrky
January 3, 2007
Edit | Reply
January 5, 2007
Princess Wolf
January 7, 2007
Kazrith
January 7, 2007
Princess Wolf
January 8, 2007
Edit | Reply
January 7, 2007
but yeah i guess it's like people who listen to any kind of music, so they can refine their opinions more precisely. it's a matter of becoming a connoisseur of romance^^
Princess Wolf
January 8, 2007
Edit | Reply
likewhatitis100
January 8, 2007
"observable fact. interesting way of putting it. but to whom is it observable? "
Osbservable to everyone.
Kazrith
January 8, 2007
so observable facts are not conclusive
oh, could you delete all the repeated comments you made, there's gotta be about 20 in there.
January 8, 2007
Edit | Reply
Kazrith
January 8, 2007
<
you have made one mistake likewhat. rational action is obtained when reason and feelings go hand in hand. remember, you killed the warlord, hence your feelings of self-preservation prevailed over your reasoning that this man MUST die.now if your reasons and feelings meet that, for self-preservation, the warlord mustnt escape, and that he must go to trial, you must make it hard for him to escape. this may sound a little mabicure but you can cut the acchilies tendon of the warlord to hinder his speedy escape. (worked with the slaves)
likewhatitis100
January 9, 2007
Self-preservation and killing the warlord is rationalized action which is the outcome if reason dictates feelings.
This is a war situation in a war zone.We are on different sides.My life is also at risk.So, its a very resonable thing to eliminate the risk.But if there is means to securely isolate the risk,then that would have precedence over eliminating the risk by killing.
Since there is no means to securely isolate the warlord he is eliminated by killing.This outcome is the product of reason which has considered the two options and logically arrived at the decision to kill the warlord.
So, my feelings of self-preservation have not prevailed over my reasoning but have been controlled by reason because the faculty of reason has been used.
Kazrith
January 9, 2007
Edit | Reply
besides, i never said you were in a war zone.
January 8, 2007
Edit | Reply
likewhatitis100
January 9, 2007
This is philosophy. In philosophy we use reason and logic in our pursuit of wisdom and truth. I dont know what the word "hurt" has to do with this.
IvoryRose
January 9, 2007
likewhatitis100
January 10, 2007
"Your views on same-sex relationships are illogical because they attempt to logic away human experience."
Here is my argument tell me where it is logicing away from human experience.
The argument: From a biological standpoint, every human being has reproductive organs. Reproductive organs are for reproducing. Therefore, every human being was designed to reproduce. It takes a relationship to reproduce, and the relationship for reproducing is heterosexuality. Human beings in that relationship are heterosexuals. Therefore, every human being was designed to be heterosexual.
Since homosexual relationship cannot reproduce, it doesn't need reproductive organs. Logically, it therefore means that the intended relationship for a human being is heterosexual not homosexual.
Question 1:
So, in your view what is the logical relationship for a heterosexually designed body? Homosexual or heterosexual?
Question 2:
Choose from the following relationship types and fill in the missing words. Homosexual, heterosexual.
Heterosexually designed body is to......relationship and homosexually designed body is to.........relationship.
IvoryRose
January 10, 2007
likewhatitis100
January 10, 2007
Edit | Reply
Question 1:
So, in your view what is the logical relationship for a heterosexually designed body? Homosexual or heterosexual?
Question 2:
Choose from the following relationship types and fill in the missing words. Homosexual, heterosexual.
Heterosexually designed body is to......relationship and homosexually designed body is to.........relationship.
Kazrith
January 10, 2007
Biology: a branch of science devoted to understanding living organisms. but due to great diversity of living organisms it is hard to draw concrete laws such as physics and chemistry have.
Dr. H. Addy
here is why it doesnt have laws
biology differes from other sciences in that biology has theories, instead of laws (terms are comparable in meaning).
why this difference?
because living organisms are not 100% predictable so we cannot be certain of the outcome, and therefore we cannot have laws, but theories.
****
now i know what you are going to say. it's just a theory! it is a guess! therefore its not valid!
another wrong assumption.
a guess, in science, is a hypothesis, whereas a theory is one level above this. this means that there is a LOT of evidence supporting it (ie. evolution, cell theory).
***
now you said this:
"The argument: From a biological standpoint, every human being has reproductive organs. Reproductive organs are for reproducing. Therefore, every human being was designed to reproduce. It takes a relationship to reproduce, and the relationship for reproducing is heterosexuality. Human beings in that relationship are heterosexuals. Therefore, every human being was designed to be heterosexual."
the reasons why you are wrong:
1) not every human is going to use their reproductive organs (and some in not the same way as others ie. masterbation)
2)it does not take a relationship to reproduce.
3)human being is that relationship are not always heterosexual, there are quite a few homosexuals too scared of who they are and what people will think of them to live/love someone of their own sex.
4)"every human being was designed to be heterosexual." this is merely an assumption with no basis of proof.
the reasons you could be right:
1) "every human being was designed to reproduce." close to true, but not all humans can.
one question for you though:
you are always talking about body design and then throw in the word relationship. it has nothing to do with your body. beautiful girls fall in love with ugly guys and vis versa. why do you keep bringing it up?
likewhatitis100
January 11, 2007
1) not every human is going to use their reproductive organs (and some in not the same way as others ie. masterbation)
My comment:
The fact that not every human is going to use their reproductive organs does not change the reality that reproductive organs are for reproducing.
Karith’s comments: 2) it does not take a relationship to reproduce.
My comment:
So, what does it to reproduce?
Heterosexuality is a relationship.
Here is the definition of Heterosexuality
Heterosexuality = Sexual activity with another of the opposite sex.
It takes sexual activity with another of the opposite sex to reproduce.
Substituting sexual activity with another of the opposite sex with heterosexuality
We will have:
It takes heterosexuality to reproduce.
But heterosexuality is a relationship.
Therefore,
It takes a relationship to reproduce.
So, what do you understand by the word relationship?
Karith’s comments:3)human being is that relationship are not always heterosexual, there are quite a few homosexuals too scared of who they are and what people will think of them to live/love someone of their own sex.
My comment:
The argument says:
From a biological standpoint, every human being has reproductive organs. Reproductive organs are for reproducing. Therefore, every human being was designed to reproduce.
Since it takes man and woman to reproduce, we can say:
reproduce = man + woman
So substituting reproduce with man + woman
Therefore, every human being was designed to man + woman.
But;
Man +woman is a relationship called heterosexuality
So,
Therefore, every human being was designed for heterosexuality.
So heterosexuality is by design.
Homosexuality is by improvising.
So the relationship by design is the logical relationship.
This makes the relationship by improvising, abuse.
Karith's comment: Every human being was designed to be heterosexual. this is merely an assumption with no basis of proof.”
My comment:
The deductive argument shows that heterosexuality is by design.
Karith’s comments: 1) "every human being was designed to reproduce." close to true, but not all humans can.”
My comment:
The fact that not all human beings reproduce does not change the fact that human beings are designed to reproduce.
All cars are designed to move on wheels despite the fact that there are cars in some people’s backyards, which do not have wheels.
Karith’s comments: “One question for you though:
you are always talking about body design and then throw in the word relationship. it has nothing to do with your body. beautiful girls fall in love with ugly guys and vis versa. why do you keep bringing it up?”
My comment:
Human body design is about everything on the human being including every organ.
Kazrith
January 11, 2007
basically you are repeating everything that you said without fail. how about something new?
you seem to use the word relationship in a very loose manner and by your definition of the word, rape is a relationship. one of the things that you seem to forget is that people have emotions and feelings. these effect decisions and logic.
seriously. take a biology and psych course and come back and argue with me again.
likewhatitis100
January 11, 2007
So, that I'll agree with your views?
For your own information I took those course already.
You ! YOU NEED TO TAKE A COURSE IN PRACTICAL REASONING AND ARGUMENTION.
-THAT WILL HELP TO CONSTRUCT AN ARGUMENT.SINCE YOU HAVE FAILED TO COME UP WITH AN ARGUMENT.
THAT COURSE WILL HELP YOU ASLO TO KNOW WHAT A VALID AND INVALID ARGUMENTS ARE.
-WHAT A SOUND ARGUMENT IS.
I ALSO RECOMMEND YOU TO TAKE A COURSE IN DISCRETE MATHEMATICS
THAT WILL HELP YOU TO KNOW ABOUT LOGIC & ARGUMENTS & RELATIONSHIPS WHICH YOU ARE HAVING A HARD TIME TO UNDERSTAND.
"you seem to use the word relationship in a very loose manner and by your definition of the word, rape is a relationship."
Define relationship for me.
**I STRONGLY RECOMMEND YOU TO TAKE A COURSE IN PRACTICAL REASONING AND ARGUMENTATION
IT IS VERY RELAVANT TO WHAT WE ARE DOING NOW
YOU WILL BE ABLE TO UNDERSTAND ME
BETTER IF YOU ACQUIRE THAT KNOWLEDGE.
Kazrith
January 11, 2007
you did take some? which ones? highschool or university levels? and if so, which ones?
likewhatitis100
January 11, 2007
Edit | Reply
The most important thing is that you construct an argument.
This makes everything questionable.
since you have not defined the word relationships, something you can get from a dictionary and you have not constructed your argument i dont know whether you capable.
Kazrith
January 11, 2007
Edit | Reply
sigh.
The condition or fact of being related; connection or association.petethemeat
January 13, 2007
Edit | Reply
likewhatitis100
January 9, 2007
REASON AND LOGIC GUARANTEE TRUTH
"On top of which philosophy prefers to eliminate illogic rather than focus on logic."Philosophy is the pursuit of wisdom and truth through reason and logic.
elliminating illogic is not a preference.It is the essence of philosophy.Reason and logic are standards which can guarantee us wisdom and truth if they are mantained.
So, if an argument fails reason and logic test we will not be guaranteed of the truth.
Kazrith
January 9, 2007
Edit | Reply
January 10, 2007
Lol...
Well i just recently (today) admit to being a lesbain i just like women alot more than men. i find them easier to deal with. not to mention i think alot like a man, so bein with one i'll always be praniod.for the most part im proud to be souly apart of the gay community.
The L Word... here i come!!!
Kazrith
January 10, 2007
Edit | Reply
Princess Wolf
January 12, 2007
Edit | Reply
IvoryRose
January 17, 2007
Edit | Reply
Princess Wolf
February 9, 2007
Edit | Reply
We are not bad people, we like what we are and you shoving "its unnatural" down our necks does not get you anywhere.
But so you know in anchent times all the women of the clan/tribe/ what ever you want to call it would get together for a night and well... I dont need to go in to detale here, BUT all the men would let them do it as they wanted to get high or do men themselves.
So even since way back then there have been gay people and Bi people.
Pen
February 21, 2007
Edit | Reply
...
Failure to control one's feelings... you say this is the culprit behind adultery and bisexuality. What about the feelings society has deemed right? Is it wrong, by your logic, to act on what is acceptable by the standards of government and the majority of society? Not to say I agree with what is acceptable, I'm merely making an example, and I have a small suspicion that maybe your use of morals and lack of self-control are convenient examples to prove your point. To clarify: my question to you is, if self control is the issue, why should we control ourselves against homosexuality and not, overeating for example? In what way do you categorize bisexuality with adultery? (other than the self control issue, i mean)February 21, 2007
Edit | Reply
...
Failure to control one's feelings... you say this is the culprit behind adultery and bisexuality. What about the feelings society has deemed right? Is it wrong, by your logic, to act on what is acceptable by the standards of government and the majority of society? Not to say I agree with what is acceptable, I'm merely making an example, and I have a small suspicion that maybe your use of morals and lack of self-control are convenient examples to prove your point. To clarify: my question to you is, if self control is the issue, why should we control ourselves against homosexuality and not, overeating for example? In what way do you categorize bisexuality with adultery? (other than the self control issue, i mean)February 21, 2007
Edit | Reply
...
Failure to control one's feelings... you say this is the culprit behind adultery and bisexuality. What about the feelings society has deemed right? Is it wrong, by your logic, to act on what is acceptable by the standards of government and the majority of society? Not to say I agree with what is acceptable, I'm merely making an example, and I have a small suspicion that maybe your use of morals and lack of self-control are convenient examples to prove your point. To clarify: my question to you is, if self control is the issue, why should we control ourselves against homosexuality and not, overeating for example? In what way do you categorize bisexuality with adultery? (other than the self control issue, i mean)February 21, 2007
Edit | Reply
...
Failure to control one's feelings... you say this is the culprit behind adultery and bisexuality. What about the feelings society has deemed right? Is it wrong, by your logic, to act on what is acceptable by the standards of government and the majority of society? Not to say I agree with what is acceptable, I'm merely making an example, and I have a small suspicion that maybe your use of morals and lack of self-control are convenient examples to prove your point. To clarify: my question to you is, if self control is the issue, why should we control ourselves against homosexuality and not, overeating for example? In what way do you categorize bisexuality with adultery? (other than the self control issue, i mean)February 21, 2007
Edit | Reply
...
Failure to control one's feelings... you say this is the culprit behind adultery and bisexuality. What about the feelings society has deemed right? Is it wrong, by your logic, to act on what is acceptable by the standards of government and the majority of society? Not to say I agree with what is acceptable, I'm merely making an example, and I have a small suspicion that maybe your use of morals and lack of self-control are convenient examples to prove your point. To clarify: my question to you is, if self control is the issue, why should we control ourselves against homosexuality and not, overeating for example? In what way do you categorize bisexuality with adultery? (other than the self control issue, i mean)February 21, 2007
Edit | Reply
...
Failure to control one's feelings... you say this is the culprit behind adultery and bisexuality. What about the feelings society has deemed right? Is it wrong, by your logic, to act on what is acceptable by the standards of government and the majority of society? Not to say I agree with what is acceptable, I'm merely making an example, and I have a small suspicion that maybe your use of morals and lack of self-control are convenient examples to prove your point. To clarify: my question to you is, if self control is the issue, why should we control ourselves against homosexuality and not, overeating for example? In what way do you categorize bisexuality with adultery? (other than the self control issue, i mean)February 21, 2007
Edit | Reply
...
Failure to control one's feelings... you say this is the culprit behind adultery and bisexuality. What about the feelings society has deemed right? Is it wrong, by your logic, to act on what is acceptable by the standards of government and the majority of society? Not to say I agree with what is acceptable, I'm merely making an example, and I have a small suspicion that maybe your use of morals and lack of self-control are convenient examples to prove your point. To clarify: my question to you is, if self control is the issue, why should we control ourselves against homosexuality and not, overeating for example? In what way do you categorize bisexuality with adultery? (other than the self control issue, i mean)February 21, 2007
Edit | Reply
...
Failure to control one's feelings... you say this is the culprit behind adultery and bisexuality. What about the feelings society has deemed right? Is it wrong, by your logic, to act on what is acceptable by the standards of government and the majority of society? Not to say I agree with what is acceptable, I'm merely making an example, and I have a small suspicion that maybe your use of morals and lack of self-control are convenient examples to prove your point. To clarify: my question to you is, if self control is the issue, why should we control ourselves against homosexuality and not, overeating for example? In what way do you categorize bisexuality with adultery? (other than the self control issue, i mean)Please register or login to comment! It's totally free