As long as there is all the atoms on earth, carbon, water , oxygen etc etc. Then theres always going to be life! Even if nuke the earth. Eventually things will settle down over the years and eventually life we sprout again. Theres no destroying it. Life comes and goes as different species. Oil spills, radioactive waste being dumped, cutting down beautiful rain forest I'm totally against but global warming is just like an ice age, should I really care?
-
Life.
As said, the building blocks of life are carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen. Having oxygen and nitrogen pretty much guarentees water. All living things contain carbon.
Through any senario, life finds a way. That's one thing you can ALWAYS count on.
50%
Voted for by
Oral Fixation,
Silhouette93,
Weydon.
-
Well, there is ONE thing
God can extinguish all life. So pretty much hope we aren't in the end times, or don't piss off God any time soon.
Voted for by
Crusader318.
-
well its more complicated than that
what you are saying is why should we take a shower if we are going to get dirty again, why eat if we are going to get hungry again, why live if we are only going to die. life is something very delicate, things have to be in the right propotions and the right amount and the right things. life is solmething too precious, you are thinking earthly wise but we have to remember as far we are the only planet in the galaxy that have life, that i know of. thats a lot of planets. a species goes instinct every two minutes.
Voted for by
pnktrky.
-
Not the Same
Global Warming is not the equivalent of an ice age because the natural world produced the ice age whereas global warming is thought to be a direct effect of human interaction with the environment (mostly negative).
When nature produces climate changes, it is out of our control. When we do it, there is the possibility of prevention and there is no one to blame other than ourselves.
Also, the presence of what are considered to be the building blocks of life as we know it does not impy that life MUST exist in these conditions. A mountain could have the proper conditions for an avalanche, but that doesn't necessarily mean an avalanche will occur.
Voted for by
Santa.
None of the choices fit your opinion? Add one →
Adding your reply:
Registration is required because of issues with spam. It is fast and free! This author would LOVE to get a comment from you, please join!
Oral Fixation
January 22, 2007
Edit | Reply
In addition...
Life is something we want to protect. Remember the commercial where the guy is standing in front of the train and says that what happens in 30 yrs won't effect him. When he moves out of the way, there's a little girl. That's how I feel...I want my children and my grand children to live in a beautiful world.My second grade teacher said flatly to my class, 'your kids will never see a tiger, even in a zoo'. I could have bitch slapped her into the next timezone. MY KIDS WILL SEE A TIGER. We just have to work hard to protect our world.
TeChNoWC
January 22, 2007
Oral Fixation
January 23, 2007
Edit | Reply
Hmm.
I'm not seeing your drift. You say to look at a picture of one? A picture hardly captures the beauty of a wild animal, an amazing creature. Seeing a tiger up close like that, a REAL tiger...that was the most amazing experience of my life. Are you saying a little boy could get the experience by looking at a picture of one?And another question, are you saying you aren't willing to protect this beautiful animal, but a picture because it's easier? Doesn't that kind of go against your religion, because a tiger is your gods creation, and it is people who are destroying them. Poaching and what not.
Oral Fixation
January 23, 2007
Edit | Reply
By the way.
Jurassic Park inspired my initial post.Weydon
January 23, 2007
Edit | Reply
Amber Mosquitos
DINO DNA!!!TeChNoWC
January 23, 2007
Edit | Reply
Oral Fixation
Hehehe yes, I was being an arse. I would very much so like tigers to be around in the future. Environmentalism is a concern that I have selfishly tried to push to the back of my mind for quite some time now. I do believe we need to look after our planet. And we aren't doing a good job. Everytime I think about those trees they are cutting down in the Amamzon rainforest, I wince. Everytime I think of those poachers out there killing a few elephants that they managed to find out of the few thousand that we have left in the world, my heart sinks.But I also think of the poachers kids and the logger's families. The mouths that so desperately need to be fed. And yet we, living in first world countries, are given ample supply of resources and yet still fail to play our part in conserving what we have. It is probably us that are worse. Our motivations? Apathy. I do agree, we need to be more careful in our efforts for preservation. But if you think about it enough, it is almost impossible. We are in this world and thus are fated indefinetly to leave some sort of indentation from the mark of our existence. Balance is needed, but hard indeed to achieve.
Please register or login to comment! It's totally free