There are 3 choices, 6 votes for Lost Identity's debate

Manipulation of language

"Political language is used to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind."

George Orwell
  • The Media also use it to a great extent.
    A dangerous new craze has been infecting our nations youth... bible reading.

    This insidious past-time has a bloody history to it, historians believe it played a key role in many bloodbaths, including the crusades and the Spanish inquisition.

    Indeed the tome itself graphically portrays scenes of murder, rape and incest- all staining the minds of our youngest and most vulnerable.

    Groups of bible abusers often meet in seedy areas known as churches. There has been reports of the leader of these churches known as priests to have sexually abused children in the name of the bible - some poor youths have actually believed this nefarious lie.

    Cathy Stewart of BibleBgone pressure group- believes that banning bibles is the only answer- "Bible reading has been linked to the murder of doctors and pregnant women, as well as the burning alive of harmless female OAP's - Ban Bibles Now!"

    Please note that this is all satirical done in the style of media spin- I do not believe bibles are dangerous... I deliberately used this topic to show the power of spin on something so harmless.
    66%  Voted for by petethemeat, Makessenseright, Energizer Bunny, nanoinfinity.
  • :

  • To give an example
    What got me thinking about this - really thinking was the Israeli campaign in Lebanon last year (remember that one?). Over here, we had an Israeli official come on t'radio and talk about who was responsible. He said that, since the Lebanese government had responsibility for controlling their border yet insurgents had still used it to mount attacks on Israeli territory, then they were responsible for the attacks themselves, and therefore the war was their fault. Is this not manipulating the word 'responsible', switching between two possible meanings - i.e., responsible as in 'in charge of' and responsible as in 'blameful for'? What do we think? Can anyone think of any other decent, recent examples of this sort of linguistic skullduggery?

    I must point out that I'm not particularly interested in anybody's opinion on the Israel-Palestine debate. I'd like this discussion to be primarily concerned with linguistics and politics.
    Voted for by Lost Identity.
  • :

  • hypnotic language
    this kind of influential language is everywhere these days, you just have to know it to see it, and for those of you who don't think it exists, i'd be happy to give you some examples or anything.....
    Voted for by hypnorocker.
  • :

  •  

    None of the choices fit your opinion?  Add one →