There is one choice, 1 vote for GaryCGibson's debate

The Sixth Heresy, Corporatism, Unfree Broadcast Press and The One

The One is the source of all things, yet major religions often fail to comprehend the non-sectarian nature of reality. The Broadcast press isn't free but is owned nearly exclusively by global corporatists and government and corrupts political freedom destroying Americ an democracy in the process.
  • The One is the Source of All things
    Corporatism is corporate control of the state while socialism is government control of corporations...each create an undemocratic repression of individual liberty, national security, border integrity and subvert the constitution of the United States.

    The founders would have revolted against a broadcast press owned exclusively by the rich, or in their day by Torries and King George's government. They would have revolted and created podcasts for the people with high intensity digital burst transmissions of personal radio freqs associated with internet homepage pod stations registered in local political districts were the transmit medium and towers are located. Because the rich siphon off intellectual capitol today equivalent to taking financial deposits out of everybody's bank accounts as soon as they are made intellectual capitol and the opportunities to use it by the creators are stolen.

    In internet emails the rich and government can plunder the publics individual privacy. Every email should be automatically encrypted with decryption made by the email reader with his own personal code. With such plundering of family and business privacy American citizens are sold out again to the globalist pimps making a farce of the 2008 presidential contest.

    The United States was founded as a Christian nation yet one must recognize the separation of church and state implicitly placed to permit un fettered political democracy. people misunderstand so much about history and political philosophy, religion and politics and much of that presently is the fault of a corrupt U.S. Government and its selling out the people to globalist pimpistry.

    The belief in God is Buddhism's sixth heresy. The world is unreal and an unreal emantion that should be reduced, erased and everything should return to never Schopenhauer understood the principle as being. Reading through Arthur Schopenhauer's 'The Principle of Sufficient Reason' in order to learn something more not only about Kant's Critique's principles that Schopenhauer comments upon but also on how the epistemology of Schopenhauer and Kant relate to the neo-Platonist Plotinus' ideas regarding The One I discovered an interesting point that Schopenhauer made way back in 1830 or so in his thesis about Buddhism's sixth point of heresy. Buddhists, Schopenhauer believed, were entirely atheist, and thus the idea that God exist is a heresy to them, and that subtle point might be of some interest to those seeking to understand why the Taliban might have been interested in destroying the colossal statue of the Amitaba Buddha or whatever of Mt. Rushmore scale in Afghanistan. Perhaps for some of those devout believers in God the monstrous mooning of God was more than mildly offensive, and those believers in God, or the sixth heresy are dying for the cause...oh well that is somewhat farther afield.

    The Buddhist notion isn't simple, and the Buddhist notion does in several regards relate to the Plotinian concept of the One and the emanations from the one. I think Schopenhauer or some of the Buddhist adepts that reformulated Siddhartha's teachings might have been unaware of how Plotinian cosmogony and Buddhist ideas of emanations as being illusory actual relate sympathetically. It is unfortunate that political actualizations of beliefs based on inadequate comprehension of philosophical and religious ideas can bring about secular conflict.

    The emanations of existence that work quite well intellectually for Plotinus and that are congruent with Christian theoretical theological understanding of the nature of God so far as that goes, and by default for Muslims too with their syncretistic, derivative religious amalgam of Judeao-Christian ideas are not at all dissimilar from the notion that Buddhist may have in ideas aboiut the emanations of reality as an illusory phenomena from some sort of actual incomprehensible source/ Buddhists have adapted the idea that because of the difficulties of the world, and because the world is exceedingly contingent being it is best negated to return to the non-being, or pre-emantation non-thought of the one, or the none if you will.

    Buddhism of course was synthesized if India by Gatama, or Sakkyamuni, and he was quite well learned as a prince in the theoretical religious theology of historical Indian, Hindu religious beliefs with there ideas about one God, a Bramha that creates the universe as a contingent state of affairs. Hinduism, Buddhism and even Christianity and consequences for failing to return to the One. Christians believe that one must renormalize to the One through the Son Jesus Christ who is the One cutting through all the red tape to visit the world. Muslims also place a tremendous categorical imperative upon submission to The One, and they do so five times a day. Hindus tend to believe that moksha or the illusory natural of contingent being, an illusory meaning that reality is not the ultimately highest reality for-itself rather than that it is something obscuring a metaphysical realm immediately present I suppose, although one can see here how the categorical definitions of meaning and ideas create redundant categories of terms describing the same facts. Buddhists straying too far in creating a cosmogony to accompany the Buddha's practical applied religious eightfold path of dealing with difficulties stoically have tended to undervalue as Muslims overvalue rigorous worldly devotions in the world for-themselves.

    Perhaps the primary difficulty in the interfaith failures to comprehend the nature of applied belief is the terminological and categorical referents in addition to what the ultimate One is for itself. Muslim have even tended to misunderstand the Christian Trinity of the One. Plotinus of course wrote about monism and pluralism, the realm of objects and epistemological subjective knowledge of objects and material rather well drawing upon the Greek academic philosophical tradition of Plato, Parmenides and Heraclitus.

    So what are the consequences besides higher oil prices for failing to understand the nature of the One by the world's religions generally...maybe more wars, environmental decay and global warming.
    Voted for by GaryCGibson.
  • :

 

None of the choices fit your opinion?  Add one →