There is one choice, 1 vote for GaryCGibson's debate

Do political labels rich governments use substitue for competent government?

President Bush has developed various theories such as the axis of evil, and now the revolutionary guards as a terror group; are labels like that effective in enhancing U.S. national security?
  • Labels , politics and explosive language
    Walk softly and carry a big stick isn't the administrations approach, its more like borrow from poor countries, do anything for oil and label like rich people believing they really do rule everything and are Adams giving names to things.

    It is better to work competently toward national security and energy independence while pointing out the philosophical problems as well as the political errors of bilateral bone-headist policy formulations.

    The administration cannot label its way out of the real world, and should be more competent. I have written elsewhere about more solid approaches to resolving Iraqi political issues, but the sunni-shia' poltiical differences, fundamentalism and political reformation in the middle east will continue to be issuies for a long time. Incompetent administration policy of a bone headed nature is unlikely to enhance American security. The spoiled rick kid political capital to spend approach will not outlast the more than 8 years of issues in the middle east.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/08/16/wiran116.xml

    http://people.lulu.com/blogs/view.php?blog_id=106
    Voted for by GaryCGibson.
    Add a comment
  • :

 

None of the choices fit your opinion?  Add one →