There are 6 choices, 6 votes for Jackymania's debate

On Non Violence,...... is it utopian idea?

At the heart of Mahatma Gandhi`s philosophy of non-violence, she (Sonia Gandhi- not related to MKG) said, was his belief that strength comes from righteousness, not force, power comes from truth, not might, victory comes from moral courage, not imposed submission.

Hi friends, please discuss these beliefs. Any one who thinks otherwise?

Read the remarks above in the entire report on the occassion to mark the International Non-Violence Day, declared as such for the first time by UN.
click here> http://www.zeenews.com/znnew/articles.asp?rep=2&aid=398612&sid=NAT&sname=&news=Follow%20Gandhi%E2%80%99s%20path%20to%20become%20human,%20Sonia%20tells%20UN

  • I think its a wonderful idea
    Non-violence appears to be difficult, but we practise it everyday in our life..... then why are people so afraid of this very thought.
    Voted for by Jackymania.
  • :

  • Its Definitely Utopian
    Non-violence generally occurs when majorities have their way already, when minorities want to change that and haven't the power for direct revolt, when violence would not be effective for a number of reasons and so forth. Non-violence requires more civilization and culture to attain while the brute and untrained thing is to take the bone away from the other dog if hungry analogously speaking. Humanity fights over the bones of prosperity and laws to create general non-violence foe the masses are implicitly predicated on the state's exclusive right to use violence.

    India today is one of the world's nuclear powers and accomplished that by ignoring the non-proliferation treatise popular after the second world war. Original sin is pervasive in human nature and that includes violence unfortunately. One hopes that intellect would prevail in civilization generally and right principles and goals would be the norm; yet consider the methods of the Mohammedans suicide cultists in seeking to conquer Iraq...how many non violent Shi'a and Sunni should endure detonations by-others annually and feel non-violence is the right response?

    Only through faith in Jesus Christ and a higher goal of eternal values might freedom and non-violence simultaneously prevail perhaps, for all circumstantial repressions of the expressions used searching for liberation from oppression tend to be sublimated under the necessity
    to do so by a higher power's presence.

    Humanity generally misunderstands what original sinmeans. It is more than a moral failing or tendency to do wickedness-it is the human physical condition for-itself with the physical drives compelled by existence.

    The human characteristics of requiring food and shelter, sexuality and human relationships-even body temperature and physical timing cycles in relation to everything from gravitational fields to sunlight and night bring humanity to act not only in ways that create friction and conflict, intenstiona;l harm to others from the Nazis to Stalinism, Al Qa’eda and Bolshevist atheism but in unintentionals and complex relationship failures even unintentionally caused. Violence often is the result including cold blooded institutional violence. Orginal sin may be overcome only through a transcending relationship to Jesus Christ that provides a borrowed grace of God that guides the Christian according to God’s predetermined purposes.

    Adam and Eve may represent biological theistic evolutionary epochs, and yet they may have existed in a Garden of Eden in a perfect form in another space and time then translated after the fall into the evolved world in a form less than that of their prior perfect existence without aging, disease, birth or death; it is certain that the sort of perfection required for perfect non-violence amidst ungoverned individuals does not exist amidst any known human social group. Of dozens of forms of alternate hominids that have existed on the Earth only homo sapiens remain still-there is a reason for that,and also why guerrillas and orangatans are endangered species.


    Voted for by GaryCGibson.
  • :

  • Yes, utopian.
    If everyone believed in the idea of human rights, violence wouldn't be a problem. We have punishments for violating these ideals, but people are still violent anyway.

    Religion has nothing to do with it. I'm an atheist, and I don't commit violent acts because I believe in human rights.

    So, yes, it is a utopian idea.
    Voted for by frattaro.
  • :

  • Just a Dream
    Utopia is a idealistic dream which should not be abandoned
    yet at this point in human history it is the impossible
    dream. Perhaps as humanity evolves we will someday arrive
    in Utopia. In the mean time keep your guard up for you are living in a very violent world and will most likely parish
    on the road to Utopia.
    Voted for by cadmelicser.
  • :

  • It's both
    It does wonders and shows true strength. It HAS made amazing movements throughout history. But to protect what matters most, sometimes you need force to defend it.
    Voted for by Weydon.
  • :

  • I would that it could be!
    Sorry but I think that non violence is a Utopian dream, but as the song says in south pacific " if you never have a dream how can you have a dream come true?" Might I suggest that while we dream we
    arm ourselves like lions and behave like lambs because not everybody invisions the same Utopia.
    Voted for by bob2314.
  • :

  •  

    None of the choices fit your opinion?  Add one →