There is one choice, 4 votes for Weydon's debate

McCain: Is this the man you want for President?

For starters, the man's temper is terrible! Some people who like to think they're just more down to Earth and not all prim-and-proper would say McCain "Says it like it is." The "Straight Talk Express". Well, that might be well and good for your drinking buddy, but I think diplomacy is a TAD important for the man who will be leading the USA and dealing with foreign leaders in delicate situations. Just imagine him in a talk with a representative from Iran or North Korea, and they pose a difficult question or accusation at him, and he responds like this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kj7HbqwZwRM&feature=related

What a baby. There's more too if you're interested.


Speaking of McCain's "Straight Talk Express", that pretty much just means he will curse at you if he's annoyed. Most everything out of the man's mouth is either misguided, ignorant, or a lie. Either way it's entirely inconsistent and worthless. For a brief but rather revealing look, take a look at this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEtZlR3zp4c

This guy makes me lose sleep. Help save our nation, and much of the world by extension. Vote wisely, tell everyone (even if you can't vote).
  • Pondering...
    as far as I'm concerned the major media selected both candidates- McCain through a current journalistic brainwashing phenomenon that employs the tactics of media exposure and bias; Obama by simply putting him up to it, supported by exposure and bias.

    So between a wishy-washy, left-sympathizing Republican and a pseudo-muslim minority media puppet, let's see... at least the media puppet would in a way be 'serving the people' by serving the media's skewed whims and agendas, the question is his socialism- will he merely be serving government-sponging con-artists in the name of Marxist idealism, bow before tin-hat tyrants, and endeavor to redistribute wealth as if the country were an anachronistic feudal state? (you may argue that large corporations are government-sponging con-artists and tin-hat tyrants, but that is another topic!)

    If I use the 8 1/2 x 11 glossy photo test that my local Democratic party employed the day before our local elections (in a typical Democrat "image over substance" tactic), I think that the young media puppet has a clear advantage over the age-spotted, skin-drooping, fossilized wishy-washer.

    I did not vote in the mid-term elections, I didn't care if the Democrats gained ground- being an American I am innately against any one party holding power for too long, any Party being awash in air-headed, mirror primping, meglomaniacal sleazy politicians; so I thus helped the Democrats gain ground in Congress by not voting Republican; and in an interesting twist, I noticed that the Dem's did it by posing as conservatives (being a poser was a good tactic in that election).

    So who will benefit most by posing, I wonder...

    Who will do the country the most good- will the puppet pander to the Democratic Party and major media, which pander to anti-industrialist pastoral romantics, Euro socialist scum, and third-world parasites? Will the wishy-washer pander to society-disregarding, tunnel-visioned MBA-layoff-crazed corporate greedsters and pay the price for lazy, prehistoric management practices and backwards-leaning, uninspired, innovation-crushing copycat-at-best mega-businesses forever on the trailing edge of technology? (ironically, Microsoft first comes to my mind before the oil industry; I'd say 'oil barons', but I'd be guilty of the typical 19th century Marxist mindset mis-superimposed on today's world by beginner liberals...)

    I think I will write in Snoop Dogg, he'd do as good a job as any of the current candidates.

    Well, thanks for the topic, I enjoyed that, and it helped me make up my mind on the election!
    100%  Voted for by wbiro, ideaman, Hardhittn63, streamline123.
    Add a comment
  • :

 

None of the choices fit your opinion?  Add one →