My opinion totally changed as i wanted to see what really happens in a abortion. It was pretty sick what i saw. There was a gallery literally showing dead babies, covered with blood in bins and just flung on tables, some even had body parts detatched.
After seeing these images i believe there should be a cut off stage where women cannot have abortions unless in extreme situations like rape. To me these were babies. As if they had been born, and to think they had actually been killed.
The stage of when abort should only be allowed in the very early stages of development as im afraid that now i kind of see it as murder.
Its weird how my viewpoint can change in a matter of minutes because of an abortion gallery
-mod intervention-
This topic has an error. Until the staff has figured out the extent of the problem and the problem is fixed, we do not suggest you try and post under this topic. If you have any further information that may help us, please drop us an inquiry by clicking Contact Us in the bottom toolbar. Thankyou everyone for your cooperation.
Kind Regards,
TeChNoWC
allphilosophy moderator
21 - 21 of 21
< previous
1
2
-
Pro-ChoiceNo offense but you what many pro-lifers don't realize is those that think pro-choice to a lot of us (not all) it's not a baby yet. It's a clump of cells with the potential to become a child. No different than a sperm or an egg separately (have the potential to become a child). So are wet dreams, a male masturbating, or a woman's period all murder?Voted for by IvoryRose.
To some of the people you are arguing with that's how we see it. Please don't comment with, but it is a baby! I already said, I don't believe that.
Me personally I only support abortions in the first 1 trimester unless a situation of rape or health risk occurs.
And so to me it's not a babies life versus the woman's choice, it's simple the woman's choice. If it's rape then more so, her choice to not suffer. In fact if it could be done, and she went for psychological testing and was proven distressed, I would almost be willing to mandate an abortion in the first trimester. (Again remember I don't think it's a baby yet, so don't call me a murderer.) If it's more than 50% chance that the woman will die, I would instate that too. But that's just me, and I realize that it's also going against choice, so I won't defend that. I realize that choice wise it's not a fair thing, so I'm not suggesting it happen, just that is what I (personally) would see as best.
Adding your reply:
Registration is required because of issues with spam. It is fast and free! This author would LOVE to get a comment from you, please join!
Please register or login to comment! It's totally free