There are 26 choices, 6 votes for keyman7's debate

If homosexuality is okay, why do the major religions of the world condemn the action?

21 - 26 of 26     < previous  1 2
  • Better Question

    If the major religions of the world condemn the action, why do preachers take part in this acktion.

    Voted for by FangsRavenMaster.
  • :

  • The Gay disease

    Homosexusuality is a dysfunction adisease that plagues the mind like alcoholicizm

    Voted for by TheVirus.
  • :

  • didn't you get it by now?

    religion is a load of bs to sum up, i do not care for it, in my opinion they are just condescending ignoramuses who've never actually lived so they condemn others for doing so, i've been to church i know. being gay does not make you a sinner how can you possibly sin for being yourself, its the christians who condemn themselves to a life of heterosexuality because they're following someone they can't even prove is real, now that is screwed up, religion is just a false hope, something to cling on to, to make you feel you're never alone but you're always going to be alone until death you do part.

    Voted for by classical beauty.
  • :

  • No God

    okay so what about the growing "non-religion"? I really don't follow any kind of religion as such, I just live like i think a good person should, and that's relative. I don't judge how others live, unless they're are negatively impacting other people's lives, in which case- Yes i will condemn you! But for the most part i just think you should live a life that is 'good' on your own terms. That being said, I'm not a heterosexual girl, but my actions and who I have in my bed does not, REPEAT DOES NOT, influence anybody else's wellbeing. Religion has caused wars, directly or indirectly, it doesn't matter, so why on earth would we condemn people for acting in a way that simple is unlike our own because 'the bible tells me so'? Think about it, look at the people, not the sexual orientation. You don't need religion to tell you that

    Voted for by Lgirl.
  • :

  • Churchianity

    The Roman Empire created the Western Christian Church as a tool to manage the diversity of the natives within the Empire. The original Christians that were early Jewish converts were spreading a message of rebellion throughout the Empire. They needed to be controlled as the idea was taking hold amongst the masses.

    The Empire wanted to control pro-creation amongst the masses as the tool to control man and his property. The powerful idea that there is one God above all who administers through a male Priesthood on Earth was implemeted across the whole Empire. The original Christian message of Egyptian and Celtic wisdom was corrupted and contained.

    Male spiritual bonding was obviously an important part of holding the Priesthood separate for the purposes of the Empire's interpretation of God's creation. The meddlesome Priesthood of the Old Gods were now the preserve of heretics and were hunted down and destroyed.

    In many Cultures the homosexual man is there not to proceate but to serve the wider interests of Society. Leonardo Da Vinci an important current example of a homosexual futurist whose message is about to be immortalised within the greatest Church of our time - the cinema/DVD/TV/Internet channel.

    In Native American Culture it was quite normal that each Tribal Chief would have a homosexual Shaman as High Priest. The Culture of the Greeks that preceeded Rome in the West embraced Homosexuality. Homosexuality has played a role in most Societies.

    Homosexuality has only been driven underground for the last two thousand years. Man has existed for much longer and the Gay renaissance really only began in earnest during the last decade of the last millenium.

    Voted for by YHW.
  • :

  • Response

    Homosexuality is a dead end in terms of evolution. When determining whether something is right or wrong, a good way to get an idea of its morality is to imagine that whatever the act is will be committed by every person within society. A society based on murder would not survive very long. Nor would a society based on homosexuality. Therefore homosexuality can be considered a threat to society, however small. But more than that, if God states that it is not right, than how can we say otherwise. Now people may reply that 'their' God never said anything of the sort. That may be true, but the most believed in gods did say something against it. Those gods are the god of Islam and Christianity. If any person claims to believe in either of these gods, they must admit that God is not a fan of homosexuality or admit that the Bible/Koran was written with inclusion of prejudice or mistakes. And if the latter is the case, where do the mistakes stop? If you can't trust the Bible as a Christian or the Koran as a Muslim, you are up a creek without a paddle. Though unworthy, I am a Christian and that is why I believe homosexuality is beyond the shadow of a doubt wrong.

    Voted for by keyman7.
  • :

  •  

    None of the choices fit your opinion?  Add one →