Just..give me some time and u will see he exists. Just tell me how many times one has to prove his existance.

JUst give me mail or comment for ur email id and i will mail u a prove not prove but a logical proof and u will have to say hence proved.

I believe, or rather, decide to accept that the existance of god cannot be proven by scripture or religion or what the faithful believe to be true. Even if god were hovering infront of me, I might not believe he/she/it exists because I have my own sense of reason that will let me assume that what i've seen is merely an illusion.

I think that for one to believe in god one must experience something, perhaps, 4 dimentional because conventional reasoning would not allow for solid belief. God would probably be something like a gut feeling of something about to happen. Perhaps faith (in the whatever) somehow opens one's mind to the possiblity of higher perception.

What I'm trying to say is that only you and you alone can confirm the existance of god (to yourself) and no religious group or person or supposed truth can prove/disprove it.

This might be a conficting view but the fact is that truth is to the individual.

First think of Science:
All energy that exists in the universe today existed in the beginning of the universe(big bang). Then comes the M Theory. Our big bang was created because of other parallel universes. How were those parallel universes created? Now, the Law of Conservation of Energy states that energy cannot be created nor destroyed, ONLY ALTERED. So how did this seemingly infinite amount of energy come into existence in the first place?

Now think from a religious perspective:
All societies of people in history(that i can think of, please correct if i'm wrong) have at the very least acknowlegded a higher being or higher beings(i am including worshipping the forces of nature and objects like planets and stars) Now why would they spend all sorts of time and energy worshipping a great Unknown that can't be proven? It is in our nature to want to know our Creator. It seems that the very fabric of our being is longing for this great Unknown. It almost seems instinctual for humans to worship a higher being(s).

the universe is to manufactured for there not to be some sort of higher mind behind it.

science is proof of man discovering the laws of nature. For these laws to exist something must set them.

with out law there is no form of intelligence.

so for the universe to follow laws of the physical universe then it must have some sort of creator.

There has to be an observor to say what exists, i.e., there is the observed and the observor. God is obvious. What we think or prove doesn't matter. Please tell me, what kind of proof do you want?

Have you ever been to Tibet? If you have not, how do you know it exists? If someone just got back from Tibet, what kind of proof would you want from him/her to prove the existence of Tibet? A photograph? A picture of him/her next to the Potala; his passport that says, "TIBET" stamped on it? All of the above? Or would you just take it on the authority of so many people who have been there and back? Personally, I would take it on the authority of the many people who have actually been there. And perhaps you should consider, on the authority of living entities who have seen God, or who are His/Her friends who have come to this planet from the spiritual world. I'm not talking about Jim Jones or David Koresh or the Moonies. Find someone you can trust who has seen God, beat a path to his/her door, and learn from this person. They are rare to come by, but they're out there and ready and willing to tell you what they know...they are the voice of one crying in the wilderness, "Here is God. Please take,and Love him."

this is a pointless question.
no one can provide you with your proof of god. the connotation of the word 'god' alone will incite either a fervent or cynical reaction/argument.
if you are looking for someone to supply you with evidence, you might as well go stand in line at the post office, or customs in Tijuana. everything is simple really. why complicate understanding with terms and designation? scientist's should learn to be children again.